Tea, Time and American Pie

THE SHORT VERSION...

I liked your comment. I agree, being cryptic depends on the song. Of course, that type of writing will only appeal to a minority. Probably English Major-/writer-performer-types! I like the analysis myself. It's fun. (As a side note, "American Pie" didn't become popular because of the cryptic verses but rather because it gave us a series of snapshots of a popular era and a powerful anthem that said goodbye to that time in our history. Without the "chorus" - heard seven times - it wouldn't have found a huge audience like it did.)

Is it fair to say that, if you want to appeal to a wide audience, you've got to pick a universal theme and give it a clear treatment?

To me, it all depends on your aim. What's yours?




THE LONG VERSION...

Tea: Thank you - exceeded expectations!


Time: Yeah, for some reason Papa Google thinks I'm in California.


American Pie:

So, I've been thinking about your comment and that song. I like that one, too. It doesn't come out and say certain specifics does it?

So why does it work so well? I think we've got to remember all the things the song has going for it:

Wide appeal

The beginning grabs our attention with a shocking headline everybody knew about: the unexpected death of a high profile American. Our common experience as a society is great working ground for folk artists. The ills of society, social change or, in this case, a tragedy that affected millions.

Style and Tone

McClean knew not to be blunt. Saying "I heard about his widowed bride" fills us in without using harsh words like "death" or "killed" that might have turned us off. His wording also shows us a snapshot of someone who has heard the news. We can see the action as it happens to the singer, either imagining what it might have been like for him or flashing back to where we were when we heard the news. Millions are on board and ready to hear more.

The verses then take us to different places: a high school gym, the levee, ten years after, the king, the jester..... He's created an impressionistic "photo album" of the 60s, dropping in hints of iconic figures and events of the time here and there.

The AAA Form combined with a Powerful Anthem

He chose the AAA form, very common to folk music, to tell his story. It works like a series of panels that unfold. Listeners immediately understand the structure. He knew that the poetic, abstract symbolism of the A sections would not stand on their own (imagine "Bye Bye" without the singalong parts to bind it together). So instead of ending each verse with a simple phrase or couplet refrain, he expanded it into a strong chorus-like singalong. It's part Irish drinking song, part anthem to the loss of young America's idealistic hopes. It contrasts the long abstract lines of the verse with conversational plain language in shorter lines (not to mention a great melody).



I'm sure that a listener survey would reveal the following: few people know the words to the verses, maybe a line or two; almost everyone would know the entire refrain.

So this song is working on two levels. For those who lived through the assassinations of the Kennedys and MLK and the persecution of John Lennon and others, the verses probably echo a difficult time in our history. The establishment was resistant to the hippie ideals and the altruism of the young. Then the tragedies, the loss of innocence and lives. The symbolic lines resonate with some real experience, however individual.

The rest of us are just waiting for the best singalong "chorus" in Folk Rock to come around again so we can join in. We hear it after three introductory verses. Its fun rhyme scheme and simple language make it memorable. Then we get six more of them to sing along with.

So that's why I believe it works. I challenge you to start singing that refrain in a group of people 35 or older and not get them singing along. You can't help yourself!



Back to the Cryptic

I can't help but wonder, though, what the verses are about specifically. In other words, "Hey, Don, who're you talking to when you ask, 'Did you write the book of love.....I know that you're in love with him.....' ? Are they the same people? Are you talking to me now? What happens then? Who are 'we' ten years after? And who is the jester? The players and the marching band? The king and queen? Who is Jack Flash? Who were you watching on the stage? Why were you enraged? What was revealled the day the music died?"

Who can say what it's really about? Ask ten people. You'll get ten different answers. Sure, we can mull over it in written form as a literary exercise. I think that's a lot of fun myself. But I don't really get why I'm left in the dark as a listener. I think he wrote it the way he had to write it and that's cool with me. Don't get me wrong, I enjoy the song!

In contrast, check out "Goodbye Norma Jean." It's also a poetic tribute to turbulent times and the loss of innocence. But because it is told as a tribute to someone in particular (someone millions recognize instantly) it is clear. In the first two lines we know who is being addressed, the circumstances (she has died), and who is singing (someone who never knew her personally, but who saw her as most of us did, as a star). The third line tells us the singer's attitude (admiration). In seventeen words we have our bearings. We can relax and enjoy the song as it unfolds. Way to go, Bern!